@BradMossEsq Sure. But you were not commenting on MPs, but on just one of several aspects of MPs. And pretending the part = the whole.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel how do you know what I was thinking? You reading my thoughts now too?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq So you're now claiming ignorance to what MPs include? OK. In any case, your clam this shows MPs work is false.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I have faith that's a point you will make clear in a few media pieces.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq You've made your point clear. That you claim complying w/1/3 parts of minimization = complying w/minimization.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I will say I should have used word "masked" in both parts of my original tweet. But respectfully dispute rest of your assertion.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq So you think evidence NSA only complies w/1 of 3 parts of minimization is a good sign?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel All I said was that the data was overwhelmingly masked, as required. Not following you further down this rabbit hole.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq What you said: "And what this article just showed is an extensive amount of minimization procedures being applied."1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel What that does not say: "accordingly all minimization has been properly applied"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@BradMossEsq Oh. You're a glass 1/3 full as adequate kind of guy?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.