@BradMossEsq Ongoing issues. They are not applying minimization procedures (which include retention, which you're ignoring here) as claimed.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel That's a legit issue. I'm not going to defend that.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq But you just did--about 10 tweets ago. They are violating letter of MPs, as PCLOB said. Largely bc of retention.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel OK, retention is a very distinct issue, however2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Nope. Every single time they testify they say Min = targeting, retention, and dissemination. You're pretending it's only latter1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Thanks but I pretended no such thing.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Then misstating? Until I reminded you MP includes retention, you said this was "extensive amount of MPs being applied."2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I was summarizing the article, hence why I said "per the new piece"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Sure. But you were not commenting on MPs, but on just one of several aspects of MPs. And pretending the part = the whole.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel how do you know what I was thinking? You reading my thoughts now too?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@BradMossEsq What this shows is targeting and retention are not working. Masking may be, but that's just one part of required process.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.