@BradMossEsq Also, as I repeat over and over and you ignore, DOJ breaking the law on notice, so how are courts going to review?
@BradMossEsq But you just did--about 10 tweets ago. They are violating letter of MPs, as PCLOB said. Largely bc of retention.
-
-
@emptywheel OK, retention is a very distinct issue, however -
@BradMossEsq Nope. Every single time they testify they say Min = targeting, retention, and dissemination. You're pretending it's only latter -
@emptywheel Thanks but I pretended no such thing. -
@BradMossEsq Then misstating? Until I reminded you MP includes retention, you said this was "extensive amount of MPs being applied." -
@emptywheel I cited what the article said, which was that the info was masked. Nowhere did it allege improper dissemination/retention -
@BradMossEsq Again, that is just one fraction of what are included in MPs. So again, you are ignoring retention as part of them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.