@BradMossEsq According to the Chief Justice, Agency Protocols are not what our Founders fought a Revolution for.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Per the PCLOB, the program is legal. And no court has concluded otherwise yet.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Also, as I repeat over and over and you ignore, DOJ breaking the law on notice, so how are courts going to review?1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel That's why that's being challenged in the crim proceedings re notice.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq It's being challenged where DiFi ran her mouth. How many people can't challenge it. We know of ~5 where DOJ breaking law.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Where is it being broke in crim proceeding where the D can't challenge lack of notice?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq You need the list of 5 admitted targets? So you're saying you haven't followed this aspect? Zazi, Medunjanin, Ouazani, QaziX2.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel That wasn't my question. I said which of those 5 can't challenge the lack of notice and why.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Um. You can go read my many posts on this.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I've seen your posts saying they weren't given notice. Which I, as I said, I completely object to.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@BradMossEsq Then you're apparently unfamiliar with the way judges are applying FISA. Bc only people who get notice (ex Qazi) can challenge.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.