Per the new piece, 98% of USP data was minimized. That is a huge figure. And no indication remaining fraction unmasked improperly.
@BradMossEsq I mean, go ahead and defend DOJ's law-breaking. But that is what you are doing.
-
-
@emptywheel How does that have anything to do with the legality of the program itself? -
@BradMossEsq That NSA is misrepresenting to NSA abt what they're doing, which based on that calls it "reasonable"? -
@emptywheel Sorry, think you had a typo there, did you mean DOJ? Or FISC? Confused -
@BradMossEsq Yes, FISC. -
@emptywheel Are you referring to the past problems that got them smacked by Walton/Bates or ongoing issues? Trying to distinguish -
@BradMossEsq Ongoing issues. They are not applying minimization procedures (which include retention, which you're ignoring here) as claimed. -
@emptywheel That's a legit issue. I'm not going to defend that. -
@BradMossEsq But you just did--about 10 tweets ago. They are violating letter of MPs, as PCLOB said. Largely bc of retention. - 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.