Curious whether those witnesses who said phone dragnet was about chaining CALLS were lying (hiding connection-based chaining) or it's new.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel If already going, they would have to be getting add'l metadata from telcos, or federating with other data before querying—no?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PatrickCToomey
@PatrickCToomey Assume federated queries makes that still more automatic: Return the smart phone numbers of Internet correspondents.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'd guess that the FISC allows them to perform fully federated queries when RAS conditions met, not just BR metadata.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PatrickCToomey
@emptywheel Don't the training materials on federated queries suggest this? Might be blacked out on p8 of newest FISC order?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PatrickCToomey
@PatrickCToomey It's possible this is what that 2/24(?)/13 opinion is about.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel My understanding is that the 2/2013 FISC opinion doesn't relate to bulk collection; could be mistaken.@brettmaxkaufman1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@PatrickCToomey I know the 2/2006 one doesn't, along w/the other two post-NYT story ones. @brettmaxkaufman
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.