@Hegghammer Also, you're ignoring the OTHER comments he made to interrogator. Why? @gregorydjohnsen @will_mccants
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@gregorydjohnsen@will_mccants what circumstances and what other comments?8 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Hegghammer
@Hegghammer My guess is USG needed Awlaki case so collapsed entire plot as his, ignored Quso, Shihri, others@gregorydjohnsen@will_mccants2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@gregorydjohnsen@will_mccants needed it for what? Why would they wilfully pursue a wrong lead?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Hegghammer
@Hegghammer Because govt tried to kill Awlaki at time when didn't believe him to be operational, per Webster@gregorydjohnsen@will_mccants1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @Hegghammer
@Hegghammer 9 months to decrypt, so after 7/16/10 memo. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1361495/British-Airways-expert-guilty-terrorism-plane-bomb-plot.html …@gregorydjohnsen@will_mccants1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@gregorydjohnsen@will_mccants maybe there was other evidence? Again, why wld they go after him if didnt think him operational?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Hegghammer
@Hegghammer Reason D Blair gave in 2/2010 was his actions led to actions that endangered US. So recruitment?@gregorydjohnsen@will_mccants2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@gregorydjohnsen@will_mccants for record, I'm not endorsing the killing. Just saying Awlaki clearly had operational role3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Hegghammer If case relies on UndieBomb, likely not legitimate. But acknowledge lots of later allegations @gregorydjohnsen @will_mccants
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.