@BradMossEsq Uh, yes. High Value Interrogation Group? You're unfamiliar with the concept? Or how they use public safety exception?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'm still not seeing issue. Miranda is an evidentiary exclusion rule. We captured a terrorist. We don't want him interrogated?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq So my worry is that HIG's methods are not as kosher as we're often led to believe. Delayed presentment serves as cover, if so.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Kosher w/r/t Miranda or in general? If latter, PS exception won't save that on legal end.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Legal doesn't mean shit when bureaucratic protections work to hide them from legal review.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Not necessarily disputing that. I would be concerned about SSP invocation if he sued saying "they broke my arms and legs"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Other defendants have tried to challenge this, making seemingly well-documented claims, to no effect. It is already working.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Like I said, I don't necessarily dispute that. I don't agree that alone is a reason to preclude HIG's involvement here.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq I'm not objecting to HIG. I'm objecting to way HIG appears to have made delayed presentment an interrogation method.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Legitimate critique. Respectfully disagree. Assuming, of course, HIG still following US-based legal restrictions on conduct.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@BradMossEsq My concerns stem from a significant amount of circumstantial evidence they may not be.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.