On secrecy, electronic surveillance orders in US courts: An ex judge and his thwarted effort to unseal his own cases: http://online.wsj.com/news/article_email/sealed-court-files-obscure-rise-in-electronic-surveillance-1401761770-lMyQjAxMTA0MDAwMjEwNDIyWj …
-
-
Replying to @jenvalentino
@jenvalentino Are any of your (WSJ) efforts to unseal more apps ongoing?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Yeah, we just filed motions yesterday in several cases in Texas. (Chose there for several reasons.) http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2014/06/02/journal-files-legal-motions-to-unseal-surveillance-documents/ …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jenvalentino
@jenvalentino Can you share why? Are they mostly Owsley's cases?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel They are, yes. Our story starts there. Some of the most outspoken magistrates on this issue also in SD Tex.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jenvalentino
@jenvalentino Everything you've seen so far is drug trafficking? Do they obviously involve cartels?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel No there's murder and bank robbery too. Plus a random prison thing. And I know Texas gets a ton of immigrant-trafficking stuff.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@jenvalentino Thanks. Interesting.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.