#NSA considers images a form of "communications."
http://nyti.ms/1pHYYo2
#NSAlogic
-
-
Replying to @JesselynRadack
@JesselynRadack And, per the article, a specific warrant is needed to get USP images5 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Also, it says court order. But Vines' claims inaccurate anyway, bc back door searches DON'T require process@JesselynRadack1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack That's assuming it's all done through the back door. If everything was, why bother with anything else?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Exactly! You know FISC has no idea how NSA uses back door searches...@JesselynRadack1 reply 8 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack So they created PPT slides for a program they don't even bother using? They just use the backdoor?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack For each of these u frame it as some attempt to circumvent the law and go after USPs. So why bother w/ subtlety?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq I'm talking about NSA programs as we know them to exist. You are pretending those programs don't exist. Why?@JesselynRadack1 reply 4 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack I'm not. But this program, per the article, requires a warrant for USP data. Incidental collection sub to min3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
@BradMossEsq And again, back door searches on collected content do not require warrant or even RAS. @JesselynRadack
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.