Section 1.2 of USSID talks abt balancing privacy/NatSec. Yet David Sanger claims Snowden didn't raise privacy concernhttp://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/30/us/nsa-releases-edward-j-snowden-email-and-undercuts-whistle-blower-claim.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&smid=tw-nytimes&_r=0 …
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Where in that email did Snowden say "I'm concerned we are not properly adhering to Section 1.2's requirements"?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq That's your refutation to my arg that Sanger's piece is horribly misleading? Do you also claim USSID 18 not abt privacy?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'm asking where Snowden anywhere within the four corners of the email raised a concern about USSID Sec1.22 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq I can pick any section in there, it'll be abt privacy. And yet, Sanger says it's not abt privacy. Says it right on front page.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel No, Sanger says Snowden didn't raise a privacy concern. That's correct. Nowhere within that email did he raise one1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@BradMossEsq Oh. Yes. Concerns abt legal compliance w/core privacy rules not abt privacy.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.