@JameelJaffer exactly. It is broken & these NSA emails w/be used as an example in Congress today to underscore that point @BradMossEsq
-
-
Replying to @JasonLeopold
@JasonLeopold@JameelJaffer You mean the NSA e-mails you secured lawfully through FOIA, right Jason?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq yes. But there is absolutely a connection in my mind between broken FOIA and leaks@JameelJaffer2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JasonLeopold
@JasonLeopold@JameelJaffer And I'm not saying *you* are doing that. But that is my question. Do we want to advocate leaks now?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq leaks happen everyday. Every time you see an anonymous official quoted that is a leak.@JameelJaffer2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JasonLeopold
@JasonLeopold And, as I have stated repeatedly, if Snowden had limited his leaks to Sec215/PRISM, I would have much more sympathy for him2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq You don't support him releasing info on upstream searches? Legally more problematic.@JasonLeopold1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JasonLeopold I don't support unauthorized leaks at all but I could have sympathy for that. The foreign intel, not at all.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq How about EO 12333 collection of USP data that falls into grey area with Section 704?@JasonLeopold1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JasonLeopold Now you're attacking an entire Executive Order.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@BradMossEsq That's a loophole DOJ refuses to pay attention to, also. @JasonLeopold
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.