How would USA Freedom Act affect the CIA's bulk collection of financial records? @charlie_savage @Gorman_Siobhan @DevlinBarrett
-
-
Replying to @PatrickCToomey
@PatrickCToomey At least as described that 2010 order is not bulk, for example.@charlie_savage@Gorman_Siobhan@DevlinBarrett1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel That's true, tho it's also not clear that's the CIA opinion/order@charlie_savage@Gorman_Siobhan@DevlinBarrett2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PatrickCToomey
@PatrickCToomey But unless ALL WU data is collected, it doesn't legally qualify as bulk.@charlie_savage@Gorman_Siobhan@DevlinBarrett1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Collecting all int'l transfers should still qualify as "bulk," no specific selection term.@charlie_savage@Gorman_Siobhan2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PatrickCToomey
@PatrickCToomey Not necessarily under Big Take precedent. And that's assuming they get ALL intl even@charlie_savage@Gorman_Siobhan1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Which precedent? Raw Take, Large Content, &c ... but which one is Big Take?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Ah, ok—but why would that suggest that CIA's collection of int'l money transfers is not bulk collection?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@PatrickCToomey That's why this bill does nowhere near what its supporters claim it does--bc it uses IC definition of bulk, not English one.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.