How would USA Freedom Act affect the CIA's bulk collection of financial records? @charlie_savage @Gorman_Siobhan @DevlinBarrett
-
-
Replying to @PatrickCToomey
@PatrickCToomey At least as described that 2010 order is not bulk, for example.@charlie_savage@Gorman_Siobhan@DevlinBarrett1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel That's true, tho it's also not clear that's the CIA opinion/order@charlie_savage@Gorman_Siobhan@DevlinBarrett2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PatrickCToomey
@PatrickCToomey But unless ALL WU data is collected, it doesn't legally qualify as bulk.@charlie_savage@Gorman_Siobhan@DevlinBarrett1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Collecting all int'l transfers should still qualify as "bulk," no specific selection term.@charlie_savage@Gorman_Siobhan2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PatrickCToomey
@PatrickCToomey@emptywheel@charlie_savage Yes, it's a 215 bulk collection program. Would prolly need to at least be restructured.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gorman_Siobhan
@Gorman_Siobhan Does it collect all WU data? IC technical def is bulk = no discriminator at collection.@PatrickCToomey@charlie_savage1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@PatrickCToomey@charlie_savage Believe it's at least all int'l transfers (dom-forn or forn-forn), tho my memory is a bit rusty.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Gorman_Siobhan @charlie_savage's Neither article says. Even if they just got "all <$10,0000 transfers," might still work @PatrickCToomey
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.