@normative Just like "al Qaeda" is included in every existing phone dragnet order and has been for 8 years. Exactly!
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel But "Al Qaeda" in those orders is not a selection term, it's a target. It is not the "basis for production"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative I know you WANT this to be selector, not selection term. If bill said that, arg would be right. Not what bill says.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel in the current orders, "Al Qaeda" is not the "basis for production" & doesn't ID the tangible things to be produced.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative Moreover, the bill doesn't say the selection term is the basis for production. It says it the basis for 'selecting."2 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel On the model you're positing the "selection term" would not describe the records to be produced, some other derivative ID would2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative And you are asking to dismiss both the plain language in bill AND known use of jargon to interpret different meaning.6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Would you be more comfortable if it said "basis for identifying" rather than "basis for selecting"?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative If it were what you think it is, "account" would suffice across the board.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I don't think so; they clearly want to get records pertaining to identifiers that may not have an "account" with the recipient.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@normative Well, there you go! We're already on a slippery slope, if that's permitted. I agree it is. But it means there's interpretation.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.