@normative I think there's a closer 1-1 correspondence on facility names than there is for AQ.
-
-
@emptywheel "in the name of" is ambiguous. You mean "in order to target". But it wasn't functioning as a selection term. -
@normative@emptywheel the probolem with this is that the IC uses the complexity of big Data via the Government to their advantage
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel The orders didn't say "give us all records registered to Al Qaeda" -
@normative@emptywheel they already have 'all records'. ought to put limiting factor as HAS 4th AMNDMT WARRANT and if not it isnt collected
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel The orders all contain the word "the" also, but that wasn't a selection term. -
@normative@emptywheel I dont suppose they will redefine that word as well?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@normative there should only be storage of information on americans AFTER a fourth amendment standard warrant, not before. :'(Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.