@normative "Al Qaeda" uniquely describes Al Qaeda. But based on that unique meaning it could support millions of different identifiers.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I think the "based on" is meant as a recognition that multiple different selection terms uniquely identify the same facility1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative I think there's a closer 1-1 correspondence on facility names than there is for AQ.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel But the selection term is the "basis for production" not the basis for some further selector.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative Not for PRTT at least. It is the basis "for selecting" the telephone lines (that is, selectors) that will be used.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I think that's a mistake. The phone line is not the selector. The selector specifies the phone line.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative Sure. Al Qaeda = selection term. Selector "based on" that is "all phone calls from Yemen."3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel not that I'd put it past them to TRY that, but the intent clearly seems to be something narrower than that.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative That's the definition enthusiastically embraced today, explicitly.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I agree with that, but I think we're maybe conflating two distinct issues1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@normative You're talking intent. I'm saying intent laid out--selection based criteria, IC's def--is known to permit large scale collex
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.