Mulling it over, I can actually think of a range of cases where "specific identifier" would block intuitively acceptable records demands.
-
-
Replying to @normative
@normative Is there a bill that requires a specific identifier? Because I'd love to support that one.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel "uniquely describe" makes those reasonably close, I think.3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative "Al Qaeda" uniquely describes Al Qaeda. But based on that unique meaning it could support millions of different identifiers.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I think the "based on" is meant as a recognition that multiple different selection terms uniquely identify the same facility1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative I think there's a closer 1-1 correspondence on facility names than there is for AQ.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel "HSBC" could be the "basis for production"-- not sure how "al Qaeda" could be unless they're awfully brazen...3 replies 1 retweet 1 like
@normative HSBC would be the "basis for selecting" which lines to tap. That's a lot of lines and potentially big bulk collection points.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.