Mulling it over, I can actually think of a range of cases where "specific identifier" would block intuitively acceptable records demands.
-
-
Replying to @normative
@normative Is there a bill that requires a specific identifier? Because I'd love to support that one.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel "uniquely describe" makes those reasonably close, I think.3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative Nonsense. They have different meanings. Add in the "based on" language throughout the bill and you're a degree away from selector1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Well, I think the INTENT is that (say) phone #, billing address, credit card, or name might all (or in combo) ID a facility2 replies 1 retweet 1 like
Replying to @normative
@normative Or intent of those who laid nice leg record (ignoring explicit IC definition of bulk collection) which only useful in Art III?
0 replies
1 retweet
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.