Mulling it over, I can actually think of a range of cases where "specific identifier" would block intuitively acceptable records demands.
@normative I think there's a closer 1-1 correspondence on facility names than there is for AQ.
-
-
@emptywheel But the selection term is the "basis for production" not the basis for some further selector. -
@normative Not for PRTT at least. It is the basis "for selecting" the telephone lines (that is, selectors) that will be used. -
@emptywheel I think that's a mistake. The phone line is not the selector. The selector specifies the phone line. -
@normative Sure. Al Qaeda = selection term. Selector "based on" that is "all phone calls from Yemen." -
@emptywheel not that I'd put it past them to TRY that, but the intent clearly seems to be something narrower than that. -
@normative That's the definition enthusiastically embraced today, explicitly. -
@emptywheel I agree with that, but I think we're maybe conflating two distinct issues -
@normative You're talking intent. I'm saying intent laid out--selection based criteria, IC's def--is known to permit large scale collex
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel "HSBC" could be the "basis for production"-- not sure how "al Qaeda" could be unless they're awfully brazen... -
@normative Except that's how they already use this in ... the phone dragnet. Selection terms listed in every single order.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.