@granick Right. HJC has completely adopted IC definition of bulk. Congrats to them for Orwell! But still allows GREAT bulks of collection.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel not sure I understand how that is “bulk” other than 2 hops for call detail records2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel my reading of mangers amdt was allows 2 hops for CDRs, but requires specific selectors for other 215 orders. No?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel ahh I see what you’re saying. I’ll take another look at that definition1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AlanInDC
@AlanInDC@emptywheel Hm. Interesting tacit idea there: Acquiring non-content with a selection term keyed to content.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
.
@normative@AlanInDC@emptywheel Read the FISC section 702 decisions and you can see that they do that. It's the "about" stuff.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WilliamOckhamTx
@WilliamOckhamTx@AlanInDC@emptywheel Obviously familiar with that; talking about something different.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
.
@normative@AlanInDC@emptywheel Think about this: The selector is "@Wikileaks", does one hop get the metadata for Greenwald's DMs?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@WilliamOckhamTx These aren't even selectors--I'd be ok if were. They're selection terms. Selectors "based on" them @normative @AlanInDC
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.