@MarkSZaidEsq the first is clearly false. the second may have no means to be tested. @KanysLupin @bmaz @BradMossEsq @Thomas_Drake1
-
-
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@bmaz@Thomas_Drake1 Too bad the ICWPA doesn't exist for that... Oh wait.... -
@BradMossEsq@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@Thomas_Drake1 Well, that is willfully obtuse as to Snowden. -
@bmaz@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@Thomas_Drake1 Because he couldn't use the ICWPA?? -
@BradMossEsq@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@Thomas_Drake1 Correct because that process, to extent it even covered ES, has proven complete sham. -
@bmaz@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@Thomas_Drake1 Ah yes, why bother using existing systems. Just break the law and assume you will be pardoned -
@BradMossEsq@bmaz@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq I used existing systems. Failed. Censored & suppressed. Trgtd for retaliation. Did go to press. -
@Thomas_Drake1@BradMossEsq@bmaz@emptywheel True, you did. So everyone else should do the same? That's the perceived message. -
@MarkSZaidEsq@BradMossEsq@bmaz@emptywheel so did I break the law going to the press? - 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.