@MarkSZaidEsq Just pointing out neither FISC nor defense courts may expose any hypothetical illegality @BradMossEsq @Thomas_Drake1 @bmaz
-
-
@emptywheel@KanysLupin@bmaz@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1 I don't need to prove legality. Others need to prove illegality. -
.
@MarkSZaidEsq@emptywheel@KanysLupin@bmaz@BradMossEsq Sure. Meme that executive authority rules. If the President does it, it's legal. -
@Thomas_Drake1@emptywheel@KanysLupin@bmaz@BradMossEsq But for anti-govt advocates the burden is on you to prove since you r ones upset -
@MarkSZaidEsq@emptywheel@KanysLupin@bmaz@BradMossEsq Anti-gov't? Quite a label for those upset enough for keeping oath to Constitution . -
@Thomas_Drake1@MarkSZaidEsq@emptywheel Quite a label to assume for oneself. Not all leakers can automatically claim it -
@BradMossEsq@MarkSZaidEsq@emptywheel what's the difference between leaking and whistleblowing? -
@Thomas_Drake1@BradMossEsq@emptywheel You're like a broken record. Either it's about your case or something we've discussed already -
@MarkSZaidEsq@BradMossEsq@emptywheel much bigger issue. What happens to ppl when exposing NatSec wrongdoing, fraud, abuse & criminalized. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.