@Thomas_Drake1 @MarkSZaidEsq @bmaz What was unlawful about the foreign intel ops? Not Sec 215 or PRISM
-
-
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Which of course is point I keep raising. Sucking up lots of USP content overseas.@Thomas_Drake1@MarkSZaidEsq@bmaz4 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1@bmaz Collecting USP overseas is not illegal depending on what they do with it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq Again, raised issues abt FISA. FAA requires warrants for content.@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1@bmaz3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1@bmaz Of course existence of issues and questions does not mean unlawful, might but might not2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq Of course. But given that govt not even providing notice for 215, how will we figure out?@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1@bmaz3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1@bmaz And I don't pretend to have all the answers. It's not my program or policy to defend.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1@bmaz Our discussion was about how to deal with natsec WBs with info, not defend USG programs1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq Just pointing out neither FISC nor defense courts may expose any hypothetical illegality@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1@bmaz3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1@bmaz Our court system has never been designed to address hypotheticals regardless of issue2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
@MarkSZaidEsq Sure. But now it is designed to ALSO avoid the non-hypotheticals. @BradMossEsq @Thomas_Drake1 @bmaz
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.