@bmaz @BradMossEsq @Thomas_Drake1 How about answering this yes or no question Tom?
-
-
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1@bmaz Our court system has never been designed to address hypotheticals regardless of issue -
@MarkSZaidEsq@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1 They are only "hypothetical" because of govts malicious concealment from Cong+citizens -
@bmaz@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1 This is the system we have for 200+ years. I'm all for change to better and strengthen it -
@MarkSZaidEsq But it is precisely NOT the system we've had for 200 yrs.@bmaz@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1 -
@KanysLupin@bmaz@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1 Correct. Past abuses were worse. -
@MarkSZaidEsq And therefore quit whining, go home, accept corruption, corpofascism?@bmaz@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1 -
@KanysLupin@bmaz@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1 Although less speculation and paranoia would be welcomed from the public -
@MarkSZaidEsq But as I've pointed out some false assumptions on your part, 2-way street.@KanysLupin@bmaz@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1 - 13 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1 Evidence can be collected "legally" and still used improperly, and we know it has. -
@bmaz@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@Thomas_Drake1 That doesn't make the program illegal -
@BradMossEsq@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@Thomas_Drake1 Again with the completely bogus+impertinent "legal/illegal" dichotomy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@BradMossEsq@Thomas_Drake1 Not to mention that "illegality" is a false+impertinent std. to Constitutional issue.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.