@mattblaze "collection directly from servers" is not the same as "direct access"! Snowden falsely claimed NSA had "direct access".
-
-
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze Snowden claimed NSA had "direct access" to Google's backend servers. That's a plain lie. And no hairs to split.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze@twrweb It's not NSA, but FBI that actually picks up the data for PRISM. I'll soon publish an article about the PRISM slides.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @electrospaces
@electrospaces@mattblaze@twrweb How about you publish something else? Like how the FBI picks that data up. What protocols and hardware?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ioerror
@electrospaces@mattblaze@twrweb Also, I'm super interested to hear your take on MUSCULAR related interception. All FBI too? (hint: No!)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ioerror
@ioerror@mattblaze@twrweb I am working on MUSCULAR, but actually INCENSER seems far more interesting3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @electrospaces
@electrospaces@mattblaze@twrweb There are just so many illegal dragnet surveillance programs and so little time.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ioerror
@ioerror@mattblaze@twrweb maybe 215 metadata collection could be illegal, but everything outside the US under EO 12333 isn't illegal...5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@electrospaces Pretty good indication they're moving stuff covered by FISA > 12333. Of questionable legality @ioerror @mattblaze @twrweb
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.