@BradMossEsq Guess Q is whether FISA governs all subjects under it or not. Disagreement there. @MarkSZaidEsq @Ali_Gharib
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@Ali_Gharib That's a legit policy debate but not a criminal matter1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Perhaps we shall test that. If NSA now destroying evidence to hide this (as they are), who knows?@MarkSZaidEsq@Ali_Gharib1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Ali_Gharib What proof of destruction exists?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq Sworn NSA declaration to FISC and NDCA.@BradMossEsq@Ali_Gharib1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq So NSA has told NDCA that it destroyed 215 data up until March 10, in spite of suits@BradMossEsq@Ali_Gharib1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Ali_Gharib What's the link for the destruction?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq Links to several different ones here. http://www.emptywheel.net/2014/04/04/turns-out-the-nsa-may-destroy-evidence-of-crimes-before-5-years-elapse/ …@BradMossEsq@Ali_Gharib1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Ali_Gharib Damned if they do, damned if they don't. But I agree NSA should have raised issue first w/courts2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MarkSZaidEsq Yep. The worst 215 data would have aged off in February if not sooner. @BradMossEsq @Ali_Gharib
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.