@MarkSZaidEsq NSA documents submitted under sworn oath to FISC. Good enough for you? @BradMossEsq @Ali_Gharib
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Ali_Gharib No, I don't know what you mean by watchlist? If FISA Ct appvd, why should NSA officials be punished?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq FISC did NOT approve. FISC went batshit. So NSA simply moved it under 12333. Voila! Problem solved@BradMossEsq@Ali_Gharib2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@Ali_Gharib So your problem is they found another legal source of authority to use?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Guess Q is whether FISA governs all subjects under it or not. Disagreement there.@MarkSZaidEsq@Ali_Gharib1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@Ali_Gharib That's a legit policy debate but not a criminal matter1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Perhaps we shall test that. If NSA now destroying evidence to hide this (as they are), who knows?@MarkSZaidEsq@Ali_Gharib1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Ali_Gharib What proof of destruction exists?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq Sworn NSA declaration to FISC and NDCA.@BradMossEsq@Ali_Gharib1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MarkSZaidEsq To which? This pertains to whether suits filed last year would cover 2009 collection in question. @BradMossEsq @Ali_Gharib
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.