@BradMossEsq Less corrupt govt (see also, more rational security). Also, Dimon in prison. @Ali_Gharib
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Ali_Gharib So far the only specific policy action I see you advocating is Dimon in prison. All else is too vague2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Also, I think someone should be held accountable for 3,000 people NSA was illegally watchlisting. Specific policy@Ali_Gharib1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Ali_Gharib Pretty narrow one and tied to what is essentially a discretionary personnel decision1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq "Discretionary personnel decision"?@Ali_Gharib1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Ali_Gharib Debatable if it could be prosecuted. That leaves if someone should've been fired. Discretionary personnel decision1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Um, let's start with it should have been stopped. It wasn't. It was put under 12333 shell.@Ali_Gharib1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Ali_Gharib That changes my statement how?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq It was institutional policy of NSA, w/DOJ sanction, apparently, to illegally watchlist 3,000 USPs.@Ali_Gharib1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Ali_Gharib Watchlist? What proof of there is that? What do you mean by "watchlist"?5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MarkSZaidEsq I strongly suspect this is the practice that NSA itself compared to Project Minaret in 2009. @BradMossEsq @Ali_Gharib
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.