@emptywheel @Ali_Gharib I think you and I have a different view of what constitutes "advocacy".
@BradMossEsq Um, let's start with it should have been stopped. It wasn't. It was put under 12333 shell. @Ali_Gharib
-
-
@emptywheel@Ali_Gharib That changes my statement how? -
@BradMossEsq It was institutional policy of NSA, w/DOJ sanction, apparently, to illegally watchlist 3,000 USPs.@Ali_Gharib -
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Ali_Gharib Watchlist? What proof of there is that? What do you mean by "watchlist"? -
@MarkSZaidEsq NSA documents submitted under sworn oath to FISC. Good enough for you?@BradMossEsq@Ali_Gharib -
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Ali_Gharib No, I don't know what you mean by watchlist? If FISA Ct appvd, why should NSA officials be punished? -
@MarkSZaidEsq FISC did NOT approve. FISC went batshit. So NSA simply moved it under 12333. Voila! Problem solved@BradMossEsq@Ali_Gharib -
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@Ali_Gharib So your problem is they found another legal source of authority to use? -
@BradMossEsq Guess Q is whether FISA governs all subjects under it or not. Disagreement there.@MarkSZaidEsq@Ali_Gharib - 10 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.