.@nicoleperlroth @rileybloomberg Interesting. Of course, NSA might have independently discovered the same bug in a slightly different form.
-
-
Replying to @mattblaze
the grugq Retweeted NSA/CSS
@mattblaze@nicoleperlroth @rileybloomberg it’s pretty unequivocal:https://twitter.com/NSA_PAO/status/454720059156754434 …the grugq added,
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thegrugq
@thegrugq@mattblaze @rileybloomberg In any regard, ODNI has a lying liar pants problem on its hands. Even if true, nobody will believe it.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @nicoleperlroth
@nicoleperlroth@thegrugq @rileybloomberg They wear fireproof pants there.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze@thegrugq @rileybloomberg v unusual for ODNI to issue a complete denial of a story. If it's even partially true, they go with NC.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nicoleperlroth
@nicoleperlroth@thegrugq @rileybloomberg It does seem unequivocal in plain english. But how to parse?1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze I'm w/@nicoleperlroth. Only parse I can see is if GCHQ exploited it. A rarity in English for ODNI.@thegrugq @rileybloomberg3 replies 3 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@nicoleperlroth@thegrugq @rileybloomberg Agree. I can't see any upside to them by lying (vs. no comment).3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze@emptywheel@nicoleperlroth @rileybloomberg it’s not a very useful bug for espionage, the IAD would shit a brick leaving in,2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thegrugq
@thegrugq@mattblaze@emptywheel @rileybloomberg I'm assuming they have something better than something that dumps in 64k increments.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@nicoleperlroth Right! "You think we'd use that clunky vulnerability! Cmon!" @thegrugq @mattblaze @rileybloomberg
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.