The #CJEU rules that #DataRetention Directive is invalid - http://europa.eu/!VX36YM
-
-
Replying to @EU_EDPS
“
@EU_EDPS: The#CJEU rules that#DataRetention Directive is invalid - http://europa.eu/!VX36YM ” Implications for US Section 215 reforms?2 replies 4 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cam_kerry
.
@cam_kerry implication: Obama 215 "reforms" are what#CJEU just abolished. I for one say, Americans should not have inferior rights to EU!2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @CasparBowden
@CasparBowden Dragnet writ large combines EO 12333 data & 215 data. Sure they get former regularly, perhaps daily@cam_kerry2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
.
@emptywheel@CasparBowden@cam_kerry Secret unitary exec mass spy authority justified under Art II prior to 215. EO 12333=umbrella 'cover'1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Thomas_Drake1
@Thomas_Drake1 under EO12333 even for wholly domestic metadata? Net as well as phone ? (and if so from when?)@emptywheel@cam_kerry2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@CasparBowden Also don't forget SPCMA: http://www.emptywheel.net/2014/02/17/spcma-the-other-nsa-dragnet-sucking-in-americans/ … @Thomas_Drake1 @cam_kerry
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.