Worrying HPSCI language could be read to allow comms providers to CREATE new records w/data they wouldn’t otherwise need to collect.
-
-
Replying to @normative
@normative Fairly clear that's true: but the permission for NSA "aid" (eg presence) may mean NSA (aka Booz) does it onsite.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Less clear it permits them to require those records to include data the provider wouldn’t otherwise need at all.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative Ah, see your distinction. Think about how they might use it to get Internet "metadata."1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Exactly. Tons of “metadata” that flows through ISP pipes that they would never have any reason to (and generally don’t) record.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative Also, did you see@EFF's point abt it using criminal law electronic communication definition? https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/nsa-reform-bill-intelligence-community-written-intelligence-community-and …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@EFF I made that very point several days earlier... http://justsecurity.org/2014/03/31/hood-hpsci-bulk-collection-bill/ …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@normative One of my questions is whether they're trying to move upstream 702 into this as well. @EFF
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.