@emptywheel August 702 compliance report & Litt/De etc at PCLOB recently. No? @LitThom
-
-
Replying to @attackerman
@attackerman You're not aware that there are more than one PCLOB references? 2 different hearings?@LitThom1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@LitThom in these cases they maddeningly stop just short of confirmation. I thought the characterization fair.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attackerman
@attackerman Again, which PCLOB references are you talking about?1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel again? The ones Litt & De testified at last year & last month.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attackerman
@attackerman Litt saying, "number of times we query 702 database for information is considerably larger" in response to USP Q not explicit?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel yeah, my strong impression from that hearing, which I was at, was Litt gave himself wiggle room on who was queried (1/2)2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @attackerman
@emptywheel (2/2) & answers were deliberately vague so they cld talk *authorities* vice functions. That's why I phrased that section thusly.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @attackerman
@attackerman OK. Your impression is that talking abt how many times they query is vague. Making case for "more explicit,' not first.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'll review the full transcript, which the PCLOB helpfully released to spare me my audio file, & act accordingly.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@attackerman And De offered to answer just for NSA, clearly on USP, in November, tho Litt gave answer. http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/11/08/the-intelligence-communitys-wide-open-unprotected-back-door-to-all-your-content/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.