@emptywheel I guess I didnt get that you're saying @attackerman really shouldn't be saying "for the first time"? http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/01/nsa-surveillance-loophole-americans-data …
@attackerman Litt saying, "number of times we query 702 database for information is considerably larger" in response to USP Q not explicit?
-
-
@emptywheel yeah, my strong impression from that hearing, which I was at, was Litt gave himself wiggle room on who was queried (1/2) -
@emptywheel (2/2) & answers were deliberately vague so they cld talk *authorities* vice functions. That's why I phrased that section thusly. -
@attackerman OK. Your impression is that talking abt how many times they query is vague. Making case for "more explicit,' not first. -
@emptywheel I'll review the full transcript, which the PCLOB helpfully released to spare me my audio file, & act accordingly. -
@attackerman And De offered to answer just for NSA, clearly on USP, in November, tho Litt gave answer. http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/11/08/the-intelligence-communitys-wide-open-unprotected-back-door-to-all-your-content/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.