@emptywheel I guess I didnt get that you're saying @attackerman really shouldn't be saying "for the first time"? http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/01/nsa-surveillance-loophole-americans-data …
-
-
@emptywheel August 702 compliance report & Litt/De etc at PCLOB recently. No?@LitThom -
@attackerman You're not aware that there are more than one PCLOB references? 2 different hearings?@LitThom -
@emptywheel@LitThom in these cases they maddeningly stop just short of confirmation. I thought the characterization fair. -
@attackerman Again, which PCLOB references are you talking about? -
@emptywheel again? The ones Litt & De testified at last year & last month. -
@attackerman Litt saying, "number of times we query 702 database for information is considerably larger" in response to USP Q not explicit? -
@emptywheel yeah, my strong impression from that hearing, which I was at, was Litt gave himself wiggle room on who was queried (1/2) -
@emptywheel (2/2) & answers were deliberately vague so they cld talk *authorities* vice functions. That's why I phrased that section thusly. - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.