@froomkin Ignoring the public record and all the details how the dragnet really works. @KenDilanianLAT
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@froomkin Respectfully disagree. There is no reliable "public record" that is the final word on a secret intel program.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KenDilanianNBC
@KenDilanianLAT But if your claim is true, claim they used dragnet for "peace of mind" after Boston cannot be true.@froomkin1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@froomkin agreed! It was spin. Review group points this out in its report, obliquely.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KenDilanianNBC
@KenDilanianLAT What you reported is different fr 1) what review group reported and 2) SCOPE of review group report.@froomkin1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@froomkin not everything that's true is written in a public report.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KenDilanianNBC
@KenDilanianLAT No. But when reams of primary documents refute an anonymous report, it does raise legit questions.@froomkin1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@froomkin if said "refutation" amounted to more than supposition and speculation, that would be correct.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KenDilanianNBC
@KenDilanianLAT About what? That 12333 data is dumped in w/215 data? That that includes great deals of cell data?@froomkin1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@KenDilanianLAT I think it may well exist, in temporal & legal fashion, but would be a far far bigger and more interesting story @froomkin
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.