.@BradMossEsq @declanm If shortly after 9/11, the WH approves a program that enables NSA to bypass FISA & says it's legal is that criminal?
@BradMossEsq Oh, really basic now big boy.
May is not the same month as March is it?
-
-
@emptywheel So I didn't find (if it's declassified yet) whatever legal analysis existed pre-May 2004. Your point? -
@BradMossEsq This is why I invited you to master the dates before you blathered on. To avoid very obvious facts of timing like this. -
@emptywheel Hence my comment about the district court ruling alone not settling the issue. Make sense? -
@BradMossEsq You were flying off handle abt it criminal charges being absurd when they weren't absurd, they were just spiked by DOJ. -
@emptywheel Where did I say "absurd"?? I said "not likely" and listed two criteria that would have to be met first. -
@BradMossEsq And they were met. Which are basic facts that should be known. -
@emptywheel The "no reasonable interpretation" criteria was resolved? Where? I saw one ruling. There were others? -
@BradMossEsq One ruling in that case, delayed by the Obama admin until after SOLs tolled. So for that case, yes, wasn't it? - 18 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.