What's funny w/people calling for Ginsburg to retire is they seem to forget how Dems love to use "do it for SCOTUS" to rally voters.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Don't follow. Wanting Ginsburg (and Breyer) to retire is consistent with emphasis on SCOTUS in urging Dem Presidents.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @armandodkos
@armandodkos Sure. But if Ginsburg is replaced by Obama, Hillary can't run on "vote for me or all that Ginsburg represents will be lost."2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Breyer is 74., Scalia, Kennedy are 78, .2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @armandodkos
@armandodkos@adambonin Sure. But that's just not same urgency as "vote for me or most liberal member will be replaced by Miguel Estrada"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@adambonin Should be. As a SCOTUS is extraordinary person, I think that it is crucial for a while. Need to win 4 or 5 in a row1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @armandodkos
@armandodkos But it's not. Especially not for women, IMO.@adambonin2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@armandodkos Obama's failure to stack the lower bench has made it harder for next POTUS to shift court to the left.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@adambonin No argument there. @armandodkos
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.