@BradMossEsq & that's assuming that it doesn't go to SCOTUS, which it may well do, even while Verrilli trying to explain why he lied abt 701
@BradMossEsq Yes. And when DOJ fights tooth and nail to avoid any review, including lying to SCOTUS, they should lose presumption.
-
-
@emptywheel This is basic federal civil practice. Annoying but standard. -
@BradMossEsq And very easy to game for the Exec. Which is why, civil procedure or not, people should not assume they're not doing so. -
@emptywheel You can assume but doesn't change legality. It it did my life would be much easier
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel You know it doesn't work that way. Never has. So long as not knowingly lying, fully allowed to respond through motion practiceThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.