It's going to take at least 4 mos to fight over whether Daoud's lawyer will get to test legality of NSA's dragnet. http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/usca7-daoud-order.pdf …
@BradMossEsq & that's assuming that it doesn't go to SCOTUS, which it may well do, even while Verrilli trying to explain why he lied abt 701
-
-
@emptywheel 701? The notification requirement? -
@BradMossEsq Sorry. Fat finger: 702. Verrilli's claim that DOJ has been giving notice. -
@emptywheel Wasn't that revealed to be due to DOJ NSD lying to him? -
@BradMossEsq Sure. Just like Clement and torture. Funny how SGs keep seeming to make false representations to SCOTUS. -
@emptywheel I actually believe NSD misled him. And that he now orders them to do what they were supposed to do -
@BradMossEsq Again, yes. Just like happened w/Clement and torture. Doesn't mean anyone has deemed 702 or any other exotic NSA stuff "legal" - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.