PCLOB's David Medine on how his terrorism-focused panel plans to assess a snooping program aimed at more than terror http://politi.co/1e0GbMA
-
-
Replying to @joshgerstein
Medine says zero/12 plots foiled by 215 http://politi.co/1e0GbMA why not more focus how claims distorted
#PCLOB ? ht@joshgerstein@normative1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CasparBowden
702 discriminates by nationality not "geography" unfortunate
@nakashimae mis-spoke, it is the main point (Cloud)@joshgerstein@normative2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CasparBowden
@CasparBowden@joshgerstein@normative 702 is for US-based collection--in that sense has a geography -based requirement1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nakashimae
where US-geog in statute
@nakashimae ? http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1881a … and as discussed targeting and defn FII is by USPER@joshgerstein@normative4 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @CasparBowden
@CasparBowden@joshgerstein@normative Untested issue: Whether FISC has jurisd over an ECSP that accesses its overseas data center to comply2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @nakashimae
@nakashimae@CasparBowden@joshgerstein I don't think there's a serious question there: Yes, they do.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @normative
@normative Isn't very definition of electronic surveillance tied to "collected in US" or on USP?@nakashimae@CasparBowden@joshgerstein4 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@normative@CasparBowden@joshgerstein That's my understanding2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@nakashimae Right. So collection overseas would only be issue under 703, 704, I thought. @normative @CasparBowden @joshgerstein
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.