@Swopa I am? AG and Court approved minimization procedures are toilet paper now?
OK. I guess you know all.
@Swopa So unless OGC lawyer was freelancing fr doc that is core of legal guidelines on NSA, she would have said minimize names, keep the tap
-
-
@emptywheel OK, so was NSA spokeswoman lying to NYT in statement about limiting inclusion/dissemination of privileged material? -
@Swopa Not at all. They do limit it. According to the minimization procedures. Which say hide the names, keep the tap. -
@emptywheel No, see the quote; identities are only 1 of 3 limitable elements. Did she lie about the other two? -
@Swopa No. Just raised ones that don't apply in this case. She even makes it clear she's talking MPs, bc she talks AG approved. -
@emptywheel Does Vines say they don't apply in this case? Does the NYT? Or is this just your personal knowledge/interpretation? -
@Swopa And again, Vines makes it very clear she is not commenting on this case. Just generally. -
@emptywheel But that's not any surprise, is it? That's as likely a part of standard process as minimization procedures. -
@Swopa That she won't comment on specifics? Of course. But you asked twice if she had addressed this case, apparently forgetting that SOP. - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.