@Swopa Your entire premise wrt Indo is NSA & its partners were not doing their job. That may be true. But there's no reason to think that.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I get that you "know" all this. My point is that NYT article is only a scoop to those who agree -- i.e., preaching to choir3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Well, people accepting innuendo as fact (as happened with Clinton/WW & Miller/MWD) is a separate issue, & positive in this case2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel LOL. "Doing their job," per your def. depends on multiple layers of bureaucratic infallibility by the folks who hired Snowden4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel This gets back to "preaching to choir" - NSA's "job" & OGC "making shit up" is based on your sense of things, not NYT article...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel ... your interpretations are infallible, & none dare question them. I'm sure the choir agrees with you! So that's all you need.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I don't doubt that "everyone you know" agrees with you. Whatever that is worth.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.