@Swopa In other words, we're talking abt an entity that US and Aus has very specific interest in collecting very broadly on @henryfarrell
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@henryfarrell And the reason this differs from "NSA collects everything" (in a 140-character context) is... ??1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Swopa
@Swopa Targets are what the "collect everything" metadata serves to pinpoint, to then get comprehensive collections on.@henryfarrell1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel So? (You're sliding into minutiae without explaining what it means in terms of the NYT article.)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Swopa Retweeted emptywheel
@emptywheel Um, "collect everything" seems to be phrase you were objecting to here: https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/435218746701905920 … Are you now agreeing with me?!Swopa added,
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I get that you "know" all this. My point is that NYT article is only a scoop to those who agree -- i.e., preaching to choir3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Well, people accepting innuendo as fact (as happened with Clinton/WW & Miller/MWD) is a separate issue, & positive in this case2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.