@emptywheel @henryfarrell Yes, but my underlying point is suppositions are built upon suppositions in your theory (e.g., 90% x 90% = 81%)
@Swopa What it means is that Indonesian govt was CLEARLY a target from which NSA/5Eyes would be expected to collect everything they can get
-
-
@emptywheel Um, "collect everything" seems to be phrase you were objecting to here: https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/435218746701905920 … Are you now agreeing with me?! -
@Swopa Your entire premise wrt Indo is NSA & its partners were not doing their job. That may be true. But there's no reason to think that. -
@emptywheel I get that you "know" all this. My point is that NYT article is only a scoop to those who agree -- i.e., preaching to choir -
@Swopa Funny. I'm running into a TON of people who are appalled that USG spies on lawyers. It's NOT a scoop to those of us who know that. -
@emptywheel Well, people accepting innuendo as fact (as happened with Clinton/WW & Miller/MWD) is a separate issue, & positive in this case -
@Swopa But go ahead, and insist that people are not doing their job with no evidence all while complaining abt innuendo. -
@emptywheel LOL. "Doing their job," per your def. depends on multiple layers of bureaucratic infallibility by the folks who hired Snowden -
@Swopa In other words, the only way lawyers not spied on is if OGC made shit up in a way that would mean NSA didn't do job. That's your case - 27 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.