@emptywheel @bmaz Depends on whether you see a distinction in "collection" vs. use of intel.
-
-
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Again, the NSA EXPLICITLY allows the use of intel except when collected post-indictment.@bmaz1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@bmaz Subject to minimization (or does that not apply to corporate store?)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Subject to minimization. How hard is it for prosecutor to guess who "USP lawyer" sub is when he's gotten legal notice?@bmaz1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@bmaz Restrictions in article mention info can't be shared with prosecutors. And pre-indictment use subject to challenge.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Post-indictment can't be shared w/prosecutor. Pre-indictment can be. They took 6 mos to indict Medunjanin. 42 convos@bmaz1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@bmaz Any restriction on ability to challenge admissibility of that info I'm not thinking of?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq@emptywheel Certainly not after it is reengineered and backstopped.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bmaz
@bmaz Just checked. Seda's lawyers just asked for further delay of remand. So maybe govt will have to settle finally.@BradMossEsq2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq The last chatter I heard up there was discussion of a deal. Don't know if that went anywhere.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@bmaz That's what it sounds like. At this point time served is getting too much. @BradMossEsq
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.