@onekade @RaineyReitman Because historically, attempting to legislate functional surveillance programs has *never* worked.
-
-
Replying to @Dymaxion
@Dymaxion@RaineyReitman so what can we do? I think we should slash their budgets but I think that's a political non starter in this country3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @onekade
@onekade@RaineyReitman Budgets help. Personal criminal liability for actions that undermine infrastructural security at any level.2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Dymaxion
@Dymaxion@RaineyReitman I see today as a beginning not an end. We need a win to feel our power. In the 70s it took years for real reforms1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @onekade
@onekade@RaineyReitman Nothing happened in the 70's. The civil liberties community got fed a line designed to shut them up and bought it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Dymaxion
@Dymaxion@RaineyReitman I couldn't disagree more. Certainly the efforts didn't take down the IC but they shackled it2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @onekade
@onekade I think there's VERY good case to be made until we restore separation of powers nothing will truly fix it@Dymaxion@RaineyReitman1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@onekade@RaineyReitman Did you read the HNSJ article on Double Government that came out recently?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Dymaxion1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @onekade
@onekade@emptywheel@RaineyReitman Yeah. That's an indication as to why I'm as pessimistic about policy limits as I am.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Dymaxion Exec has tried VERY hard (and abt sole PR success) at pretending this is just about 215 and 702 @onekade @RaineyReitman
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.