@Kat_Missouri Your theory of war basically leaves the country at the mercy of more dangerous TCO. It seems unwise.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel The United States once allied with Organized Crime to defeat the Nazis & w/ Soviet Russia. Risk to benefit ratio. State craft4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Kat_Missouri
@Kat_Missouri Yes. But the logic of your approach to networks would dictate that we go after the banks more aggressively than AQ.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel No, because you insist on ignoring the one, very significant difference: One is violent & will seek to kill, the other wants $1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Kat_Missouri
@Kat_Missouri Hmm. Seems a foolish distinction to me. They'll both do anything to accrue power. The banks are just more effective.3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel So, when you say that they are more dangerous, without assessing the real threat of an economic collapse, that is a problem2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Kat_Missouri
@Kat_Missouri So it seems clear to me you haven't assessed the threat.5 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel What I understand is logistics. I understand JIT delivery systems that can be interrupted by local & regional actors.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Kat_Missouri
@Kat_Missouri SPECIFIC reason given for bailing out banks was to prevent financial collapse, brought by crimes, from interrupting market.4 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel That is true. But there is a reason we bailed out GM as well. It's called "Vital American Interest". Meaning of necessity2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@Kat_Missouri Yup (though we screwed up w/both GM and battery investments and will lose some other countries).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.