@Kat_Missouri Incidentally did you notice Clapper did not mention financial warfare in UNCLASS Global Threats hearing like he did last year?
-
-
-
Replying to @Kat_Missouri
@Kat_Missouri You seem to be suggesting there's no such thing as financial warfare.4 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Oh, I believe there is. Especially when terror organizations announce their strategy as "a 1000 cuts", aim for financial1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Kat_Missouri
@Kat_Missouri Again, you seem to believe US should adopt harsher tactics w/TCOs that announce their intention rather than use better OpSec2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Because I do not believe that we are discussing the same war that doesn't just target banks as "financial infrastructure"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Kat_Missouri
@Kat_Missouri Your theory of war basically leaves the country at the mercy of more dangerous TCO. It seems unwise.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel The United States once allied with Organized Crime to defeat the Nazis & w/ Soviet Russia. Risk to benefit ratio. State craft4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Kat_Missouri
@Kat_Missouri That we don't suggests we no longer have the ability to protect the country from the most dangerous threats.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel You say it is the most dangerous of threats. That is not how threats are assessed. I am unsure how you think threat assessments2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Kat_Missouri Yes, I'm quite aware that NatSec establishment does not actually take on the most urgent threats to country. It IS a problem,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.